Letter: Moving the King's Library
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PETER HOARE (letter, 1 April) is right that the King's Library is as magnificently housed in its new setting in St Pancras as it was in the British Museum. There are, however, points in Brian Lang's letter (23 March) which call for comment.
The suggestion that the books would have disintegrated "in time" if they had remained where they were is unconvincing for those of us who have handled books and manuscripts up to 500 years old which still appear to be in pristine condition despite the absence of air conditioning, either because they have been very little used or because of the excellence of the materials used in making them, or more likely, both. Whatever the storage conditions, the paper most likely to disintegrate is the cheaper kind manufactured from wood pulp in the middle of the 20th century. None of the King's Library books falls into that category.
G CHOWDHARAY-BEST
London SW3
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments