Letter: Moving Bosnia's ethical boundaries
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Zoltan Rae
Sir: There is much in Germaine Greer's article ("War is hell. We can't get enough of it," 1 September) with which I can agree but, for those of us who enjoy the powers of analytical thinking, it is not the case that we read newspapers for emotional entertainment but because of a stark bewilderment as to the kind of irrational world we live in. Nato's actions over the past few days raise a number of obvious issues, namely, those of killing and the value we place on human life.
The idea that air strikes are a legitimate method of installing peace is ludicrous. First, surely we have learnt our lesson of blind, consequentialist ethics from the atrocities committed in Nagasaki and Hiroshima for example? Apart from a spectacle of technological supremacy, what are air-raids apart from a reply to blood with blood? Secondly, the possible justification for such actions, that of deterrence, could be undermined as it may do nothing to deter the Bosnian Serbs - the act of "legal" vengeance may strengthen nationalism and succeed in winning a hideous fame for certain war criminals.
The idea of a world peace-keeping force that sets itself up as a supreme judge with the power to move the boundary between defensive/offensive strategies at will, is such a sleazy rationalisation that it has outraged my sense of logic.
Yours sincerely,
Zoltan Rae
Bath, Avon
1 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments