LETTER: Most Scots want devolution
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SIMON PARTRIDGE (Letters, 10 December) is in error. The 1979 referendum on devolution resulted in a majority in favour of the measure. The reason this majority did not prevail was due to a maverick Labour MP's amendment to the Devolution Bill to the effect that there had to be a 40 per cent majority, not of those who actually voted, but of all on the electoral register. This meant that every non-voter was automatically counted as a No vote. Has any party achieved such a majority under such terms in recent times?
His reference to opinion polls is also misleading. If voters are presented with a list of priorities many will plump for matters of immediate concern such as jobs and health. Mr Partridge carefully avoided mention of opinion polls canvassing opinions on the constitutional position in Scotland. Every such poll taken recently has shown that at least 75 per cent of the population is in favour of some form of self-determination for Scotland.
Mr Partridge is also in error in saying the Scots have been content to be part of a unified parliamentary state. At the time of the Act of Union there was not democracy in either Scotland or England, but there were clear demonstrations in Scotland that the Act was not welcomed by most ordinary Scots. The decision was made by an unrepresentative Parliament, largely for the pecuniary betterment of those making the decision and their friends. The unrest at the time, and the simmering discontent which erupts from time to time into more active discontent, has existed ever since.
Barbara Simon
Edinburgh
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments