: Letter: More time for 'House'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Cllr Eric Flounders' decision to enforce the deadline for the removal of Rachel Whiteread's sculpture may be within the law, but his comments (Letters, 25 November) typify how inflexible the committee he chairs can be.
Under regular planning law, what is to prevent an extension of the deadline set by the original agreement so that more people can view this innovative work? Perhaps Cllr Flounders should remember that the Eiffel Tower was supposed to have been pulled down. It's hardly done Paris any harm.
Yours faithfully,
TIM DICKENSON
Bow and Poplar
Conservative Association
London, E14
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments