Letter: Morals and merits of sex selection clinics
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The apologies given by Ronald Ericsson for sex selection clinics are very unconvincing ('British attitude 'is arrogant hogwash' ', 23 January). He argues first that sex selection has been established in America for a long time. There is no virtue, however, simply in a practice's age: the electric chair has also been established in America for a long time, although this would not be one of the first things to come to mind as a hallmark of civilisation.
Dr Ericsson also argues that 'if you do not allow people to take advantage of it, they will seek it elsewhere'. This argument is a subterfuge. It is reminiscent of British firms producing torture equipment for export: if they did not do it, companies from other countries would, and would gain the profits.
You report that 'Doctor's say many Asians value boys more than girls'. Perhaps, but so too do many Europeans. The historical repercussions of primogeniture and institutionalised sexism (eg women in the UK not obtaining the vote on the same terms as men until 1928) still affect much parental thinking.
If sex selection clinics do become common in the UK, they will not so much originate a problem as allow existing prejudice to become manifest. It must be very doubtful whether legal prohibition of such clinics would help in any way to eradicate sexual prejudice. Law is not an instrument of education.
Yours faithfully,
GARY SLAPPER
Law School
Staffordshire University
Stoke-on-Trent
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments