Letter: Monarchs aren't meant to lead
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter: Monarchs aren't meant to leadA SINGLE phrase in Tina Brown's account of their lunch (Review, 21 September) pinpoints the basic factor in Princess Diana's tragic life - "Charles is not a leader". For despite the trappings that surround the monarchy when acting as the nation's representative, a constitutional monarch is not its "leader".
The position is best described as an hereditary "eminence grise", accumulating wisdom and exercising influence that can be achieved only in private. Consort to the heir to a throne operating within such constraints was incompatible with the stardom for which Diana was destined and longed. Fortunately both of Prince William's blood families are well endowed with genes and traditions conducive to the successful discharge of this difficult role.
Lewis Stretch
Godmanchester, Cambs
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments