LETTER : Minister defends asylum policy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Contrary to the views expressed by Polly Toynbee in her article and Jan Shaw of Amnesty International in her letter, both of 5 February, asylum seekers are not "arbitrarily detained" without "legal remedy" while their cases are being processed.
Detention is used in less than 1.5 per cent of asylum cases and only where there is good reason to suspect that those concerned will not turn up for interview or leave the United Kingdom when required. The overwhelming majority of those in detention - some 75 to 80 per cent - have already had their asylum applications considered and refused, so it is simply wrong to suggest that we routinely detain people as soon as they claim asylum.
Indeed, many will have had their appeals - by independent adjudicators - rejected and will be awaiting removal or deportation.
Detention is only authorised by chief immigration officers and all cases are reviewed on a regular basis at an increasingly senior level. All detainees are told the reason for their detention and know that their cases are kept regularly under review by the Immigration Service. They are able to apply to the courts for bail after seven days and it is also open to them to apply for a writ of habeas corpus or seek judicial review, as indeed some of those on hunger strike at Rochester have already unsuccessfully done.
ANN WIDDECOMBE
Minister of State
Home Office
London SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments