LETTER: Milk is a body fluid too Carnivores really do care

James R. Adams
Saturday 23 December 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

JM Coetzee's article "Why we worry about meat" (10 December) was correct in describing many meat-eaters as liking to distance themselves from the animal origins of their food, but was careless in asserting distaste "for body fluids in their fluid state" - what about milk?

It is doubtful whether many Christians, Jews or Muslims would today wish to rely on the culinary advice of the author of Leviticus, any more than they would rely on his medical advice.

Nevertheless, most people would draw a line between what is acceptable to eat and what is not. I would suggest that the answer is that this comes from within, and is largely aesthetic. If Chinese peasants can thrive on dog, so can British bankers - but would probably choose not to.

Anyone who values human ideals will wish to know that animals killed to feed them were reared appropriately and slaughtered without cruelty. Those who say they would not wish animals killed to feed them under any circumstances must face the fact that the animals would then never be born; and the consequences for the dairy and wool industries would be traumatic.

James R Adams

Weybridge, Surrey

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in