Letter: Military intervention, not dithering, is needed in Yugoslavia
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article today (29 June) refers to Europe's shame exposed by President Francois Mitterrand's visit to Sarajevo. But it is Britain's shame that has above all been exposed by the tragic events in Yugoslavia.
Last July, Douglas Hurd dismissed Slovenia and Croatia's declarations of independence from the Milosevic dictatorship, describing them as 'petty unstable statelets'. In September, he scuppered French and German plans for a joint European peace-keeping force. The 300 members of the field ambulance corps, belatedly and reluctantly deployed, are a pathetically inadequate contribution. Only yesterday, Mr Hurd reiterated that there were no plans whatsoever to increase the number of British troops. Meanwhile, tens of thousands of Bosnian civilians face death or starvation.
The difficulties involved in military action against the Serb irregulars have been much exaggerated. Their success has only been achieved against forces lacking military equipment. There can be little doubt that faced with an effective Western army, whether under the flag of Nato, the UN or the EC, they would capitulate as rapidly as did the Iraqis in Kuwait.
What is lacking is the political will to achieve this. Is it too much to hope that President Mitterrand might finally have shamed the British government into sending troops rather than yet more impotent diplomats to the Balkans?
Yours faithfully,
JOHN CHILVER
London, SW9
29 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments