Letter: Memories of abuse
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your article ("Abuse claims may be false memories", 1 October) stating that the Royal College of Psychiatrists "is split between those who are sceptical that recovered memories have their basis in fact and those with a conviction that the memories of disturbed patients must be both believed and followed up" is something of an exaggeration.
Many of us are inclined to believe our patients' complaints, but to regard them sceptically where necessary, and the degree of belief or scepticism will vary from case to case. The problem with the RCP report - at least the draft that I saw - was that it gave an entirely one-sided account of the situation.
A second concern - and I write as a specialist in memory disorders - was that the report contained fundamental misunderstandings about contemporary concepts in memory theory, which it would have been embarrassing if the Royal College had published.
Your case study ("You can do nothing when you're wrongly accused. No one wants to know") is interesting, but it contrasts with your report on a discussion of child abuse at the British Psychological Society, of which you remark "because of the extreme sensitivity of the material no details can be published". Without knowing or wishing to comment in any way on the case example you discussed, I would simply remark that these situations are always sensitive, delicate, and complicated, and are seldom well represented in the media.
MICHAEL KOPELMAN
Division of Psychiatry and
Psychology
St Thomas's Hospital
London SE1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments