LETTER:Measuring unemployment: the figures and the `fiddle' theories
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Ken Coates, MEP
Sir: Phillip Oppenheim denies that there is a jobs crisis confronting young people. If fewer people aged 16-21 are employed, according to Mr Oppenheim, "this is almost entirely due to the massive increase in the proportion of young people in higher education". The truth is quite different.
John Hughes of Ruskin College estimates that between 1990 and 1994 there was a fall of 745,000 in the full-time employment of young people under 21, a fall of well over half (56 per cent). There was also a fall of 330,000 for those aged 21-24. Thus, in just four years, there is a total decline in full-time employment of more than one million people aged under 25.
For Great Britain between 1990 and 1994, the officially recorded (claimant) unemployment of young people aged under 20 rose by 65 per cent, to 206,195; the recorded unemployment of young people aged 20-24 rose by 62 per cent, to 511,589. The increase in recorded unemployment for all those under 25 was 277,298 between April 1990 and April 1994.
The unemployment figures were already "massive" in 1990 when there were 440,000 claimant unemployed under 25; they were socially disastrous in 1994 when they had reached 717,784 for the under-25s. If Mr Oppenheim doesn't want to respect other people's figures, at least he should pay attention to his own.
Yours sincerely,
KEN COATES
MEP for Nottinghamshire North & Chesterfield (Lab)
Mansfield, Nottinghamshire
The writer is Rapporteur of the European Parliament's temporary committee on employment.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments