Letter: Married priests or faith by restrictions?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your report 'Married priests 'no problem to Vatican' ' (27 November) says that 'If Dr Leonard (Dr Graham Leonard, the Anglican former bishop of London) were recognised as a Roman Catholic bishop, he would become the first married Catholic bishop in England.' The statement, in an otherwise careful article, goes beyond the evidence.
Beginning with the record of the bishops of York, London and a bishop from an unidentifiable see who attended the council of Arles in 314, the evidence shows there were bishops in this country in the fourth century (albeit the country was then called Britain, not England). That was before the imposition of compulsory celibacy upon the clergy, including bishops, of the western Church. It is therefore probable, and certainly possible, that some of the bishops in question were married.
Yours sincerely,
NORMAN TANNER
Oxford
28 November
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments