Letter: Marriage Bill gives couples a choice of places to wed

Mrs Fiona Jackson
Wednesday 27 July 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I am afraid that Virginia Ironside reveals ('Dear Gyles Brandreth', 25 July) that all-too- common vice of Anglo-centricity in her views on Gyles Brandreth's proposed Marriage Bill.

In the Northern Kingdom, marriages can be carried out anywhere, as long as a minister officiates, and to Scots, this in no way trivialises the ceremony. Indeed, marriage in the home emphasises the domestic importance of the union, while marriage in hotels, castles, etc, allows all of the population to wed in imposing surroundings, should they wish.

Hardwicke's Marriage Act in the mid-18th century was only enabled because clandestine marriage had become a major problem in England, as portrayed in the fiction of the time. Virginia Ironside's stricture may be of use in preventing rakes forcing themselves in marriage on defenceless heiresses, but I would hope that today's women are not so naive as their 18th-century forebears.

As one who married in a hotel, in what Virginia Ironside would regard as trivial circumstances, I can assure her that the importance of the ceremony was in no way diminished by the surroundings for either participants or onlookers and allowed friends and family from all over the country to attend at a time not possible at a registry office.

No wonder many English couples cross to Gretna to get married.

Yours faithfully,

FIONA JACKSON

Preston, Lancashire

26 July

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in