Letter: Mapplethorpe's photo is porn
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Suzanne Moore ("Photography and the new censorship", 12 September) springs to the defence of the photographer Robert Mapplethorpe, and declares that the police and others who asked that the photograph Rosie, of a three- year-old girl, be withdrawn from his exhibition, are a tiny minority. She says that it will soon become impossible to take an innocent photograph of a little child.
I enclose a copy of the photograph (for your information only), which I have described as "horrific". Suzanne Moore wonders if I had seen it before I made my comment. I would never have dreamed of criticising it had I not seen it. It seems to me exploitative and pornographic, and should never be on public view. I saw it and commented on it because I was asked to do so by women who were as offended as I was.
ESTHER RANTZEN
BBC, London W12
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments