Letter: Mapplethorpe's photo is porn
Your support helps us to tell the story
My recent work focusing on Latino voters in Arizona has shown me how crucial independent journalism is in giving voice to underrepresented communities.
Your support is what allows us to tell these stories, bringing attention to the issues that are often overlooked. Without your contributions, these voices might not be heard.
Every dollar you give helps us continue to shine a light on these critical issues in the run up to the election and beyond
Eric Garcia
Washington Bureau Chief
Sir: Suzanne Moore ("Photography and the new censorship", 12 September) springs to the defence of the photographer Robert Mapplethorpe, and declares that the police and others who asked that the photograph Rosie, of a three- year-old girl, be withdrawn from his exhibition, are a tiny minority. She says that it will soon become impossible to take an innocent photograph of a little child.
I enclose a copy of the photograph (for your information only), which I have described as "horrific". Suzanne Moore wonders if I had seen it before I made my comment. I would never have dreamed of criticising it had I not seen it. It seems to me exploitative and pornographic, and should never be on public view. I saw it and commented on it because I was asked to do so by women who were as offended as I was.
ESTHER RANTZEN
BBC, London W12
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments