Letter: Manifesto for recovery: Gatt, housing market, monetary policy

Mr R. S. Musgrave
Friday 23 October 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I have two quibbles with your 'manifesto' (22 October). First, you overdo the importance of free trade. Free trade does increase output per head and living standards; it does not raise employment. Indeed, as Paul Ormerod points out (Letters, 22 October) economic recovery in the Thirties was effected alongside deliberate restrictions on free trade.

Second, the commitment to a balanced budget is unrealistic. I realise governments must make anti-inflationary noises, but the fact is that since money was invented several thousand years ago we have had inflation. Inflation reduces the real value of the money supply, the monetary base in particular, and since the latter must be maintained (and indeed expanded in real terms as the economy grows), we will in reality continue to have at least a small unfinanced budget deficit for the decades and centuries to come. A commitment to keep inflation below about 5 per cent by whatever means (which is one of the Bundesbank's main objectives) would be more realistic.

Yours faithfully,

R. S. MUSGRAVE

Durham

22 October

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in