Letter: Man means person
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Yve Newbold (letter, 18 February) is on the wrong tack. By assigning the whole of mankind to the male half, she condemns herself to perpetual slight and feelings of inferiority. The more he-
or-she writes about him-or-her, the more women are made to appear as a separate and secondary order of beings; and the more feminists try to insist on gender- neutral language, the stronger the impression that they are ashamed of their sex.
The tendency of European languages, from ancient Greek onwards, has been to extend the masculine to become an all-purpose personal gender. That enables women, when their sex is not relevant, to be considered simply as persons and not in a special category, added as an afterthought, with the implication that they are also-rans.
Yours sincerely,
J. R. LUCAS
Merton College
Oxford
18 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments