Letter: Malaysian views on media freedom; British attitudes to aid and trade
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: If a government were to spend money on creating jobs, it would surely do so in sectors that are perceived to be undersupplied - such as public transport and teaching - rather than in sectors perceived to be oversupplied, such as weapons manufacture.
It would, moreover, get better value for money by investing in labour-intensive, rather than capital-intensive, activities (arms manufacturing is possibly the most capital-intensive industry of all). It is, therefore, hard to draw any conclusion other than that the Government's principal motivation in linking arms sales to dam building was not the creation or protection of British jobs.
Yours sincerely,
GEORGE MONBIOT
Oxford
3 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments