Letter: Major's confused definition of Back to Basics issues
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your headline 'Major says 'basics' not a moral crusade' (7 January) is not only at odds with the accompanying quotes from the last Tory conference, but with the statement extending its definition from common-sense policies to include 'wider issues of decency, courtesy, neighbourliness, respect for others - and tolerance and understanding - but not personal morality'.
Decency, courtesy, neighbourliness, respect for others and tolerance are all attributes of personal morality. If we want to get back to the times when it was safe for old and young to walk the streets, to a situation where family life means respect for the responsibilities of parenthood by both parents, where the stronger take responsibility for those less able, then these attributes must be displayed in individuals.
I believe John Major, in common with all people of goodwill, wants to see these values adopted. We must understand that society is only the sum of its individuals and therefore an understanding and demonstration of individual morality is the responsibility of us all.
Politicians cannnot divorce individual morality from this collective effect. Neither can they simply say it is a job for the Church (Virginia Bottomley; Radio 4, 6 January). Yes, it is the job of the Church to teach, but it is the business of those who ask it to teach to listen and live by the basic tenets taught by all the great world religions. To do otherwise is hypocrisy not leadership.
Yours faithfully,
DAVID TAYLOR
Stubbington,
Hampshire
7 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments