Letter: Magistrates' independence under threat
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Much has been written about the proposals for changes in the police force, but little about decisions the Government has made for magistrates' courts. Yet if these decisions become law, society will have lost one of the fundamental principles upon which our judicial system operates, that is, to ensure justice is independent and free of all pressures from government.
The Lord Chancellor keeps reiterating that he 'will enshrine in law the independence of magistrates and justices' clerks'. This would not be necessary if the Government abandons or amends the swingeing proposals by which it intends to reduce drastically the number of magistrates' courts committees, impose a structure of management upon the new areas and introduce fixed-term contracts and performance appraisals for justices' clerks, together with other changes. Judicial independence already operates within the present system; it is only because of government decisions that there is a need to 'enshrine judicial independence' in legislation.
The Government's proposals will bring magistrates' courts into a closer relationship with the Civil Service and introduce measures of control which are anathema to our understanding and belief that 'justice must not only be done, but be seen to be done'.
Magistrates object most strongly to being linked with police matters in the one Bill. We are entirely separate from the police, but are told that because of pressure on parliamentary time we have been included in the same Bill. Could there be an ulterior reason, that the emotive subject of policing and law and order will dominate the debate in Parliament and the crucial role of magistrates' courts be overlooked?
The freedom of our judiciary system is a right that must never be interfered with. We must ensure that the Bill is either defeated or amended in such a way that judicial independence remains sacrosanct and magistrates' courts are allowed to function without government interference.
Yours sincerely,
JOAN R. STRAKER
Chairman
North Eastern Regional Group of Chairmen of Benches and Magistrates' Courts Committees
Magistrates' Courts
Newcastle upon Tyne
27 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments