LETTER: `Lumps of wood' that give our cities a soul
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Surely Jane Jakeman's suggestion that our cities would be improved by having their trees removed is not serious ("A nation obsessed by large lumps of wood", 30 December). Imagine Berkeley Square or Birdcage Walk without trees.
But she is right to condemn our national obsession with the preservation of old trees. A tree has to be either expectionally beautiful, very famous or in some way irreplaceable to merit its life being extended beyond its healthy span. Our forefathers sawtrees as a crop to be harvested and replanted. Trees that were too old to use as timber became fuel.
If south-east England had more young and middle-aged trees and fewer superannuated ones, the 1987 hurricane would have beenless devastating. Ms Jakeman says: "A tree is a lump of wood." I say: "Plant more trees and use more wood."
Yours faithfully, ALICE RENTON Mount Harry Trees Offham, East Sussex 30 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments