Letter: Loyally taking the Pope at his word
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Father Michael O'Dowd (Letters, 1 June) takes a rigidly legalistic view of papal authority in reducing firm statements that might be classified as 'non-infallible' to fallibly trying to 'shout the loudest'. He seems to come close to that extremely modern minimalism in the Catholic Church which sees any such non ex cathedra papal teaching simply as 'the Pope's private opinion however extravagantly conveyed'. (Vincent McLaughlin, also letters, 1 June.) The Church's Second Vatican Council states:
loyal submission of the will and intellect must be given in a special way to the authentic teaching authority of the Roman Pontiff, even when he does not speak ex cathedra, in such wise . . . that one sincerely adhere to decisions made by him, comformably with the manifest mind and intention. ( Dogmatic Constitution on the Church n25, 1964)
Last Monday, the Pope constitutionally confirmed and committed the Catholic tradition to the maleness of the priesthood - almost as strongly as it is, one might say, to the femaleness of motherhood (cf, past and future statements on actual and proposed methods of baby creation). The hope of the Church's 'loyal' subjects must now surely be for ever more fruitful work in vindicating the profound and prophetic character of this latest witness to an unsympathetic world.
Yours faithfully,
HUGH MACKENZIE
Venerable Collegio Inglese
Rome
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments