Letter: Loyalist toll tells its own bleak story

Mr Neil Barnet
Tuesday 02 November 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: As David McKittrick correctly notes (1 November), loyalists are killing more people than the IRA, in terms of civilian deaths; however, this is not a new phenomenon. According to the Belfast Independent Research Group ('Killings in Northern Ireland', Radical Statistics Newsletter, spring 1992), between 1969 and December 1990 loyalists were responsible for 764 civilian deaths; over the same period, the IRA killed 570 civilians, and the Army and RUC killed 329 members of the public.

If the RUC and the military have always maintained that the IRA is the greatest threat, it is surely because the IRA has been more of a threat to them. The IRA has killed more than 1,000 members of the British forces; loyalists have killed only 11.

As the rate of loyalist killings continues to accelerate, it is an insult to the victims and their families to maintain the fiction that the IRA is the sole cause of the conflict, with the Ulster Freedom Fighters et al playing only a secondary, reactive and less dangerous role.

Yours sincerely,

NEIL BARNET

London, SE24

1 November

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in