Letter: Lottery addiction
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The alarmist tone of your leading article overlooks the scale of lottery playing throughout the world. The per capita sales in the UK are 24th on the international list. In 1997 we spent only pounds 98 a head, whereas South Dakota achieved pounds 463.
The ills you describe are not apparent in New York, which spent pounds 138 per person last year, Norway a similar amount and Massachusetts pounds 322. The difference is that all these hugely successful lotteries did not need to lose hundreds of millions of pounds in profits to their operators, because their laws are better framed. Oflot is legally required to maximise the funds to the good causes, yet mistakenly accepts that large profits are the only way of running a successful lottery.
DENIS VAUGHAN
Executive Director
The Lottery Promotion Company
London WC2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments