Letter: Looking beyond appearances
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: We do not know all of the facts that surround the Norfolk social workers' decision not to match a mixed-race child with mixed-race carers; we do not even know what the racial mix of the child in question is; but what is clear is that both social workers and positive-race policies are under attack yet again.
Even the considered views of Harry Zeitlin, a professor of child and adolescent psychiatry ('Children put love first, not black or white', 12 July), reduce the issues to appearances. It may well be the case that some white 'liberal' social workers have definitions of race equality that bear little relationship to the aspirations and expectations of black people, and that crude and simplistic definitions are employed by them. But the fact is that considerable damage has been done to black children over the last three decades by placing them with white families. Some have benefited, many more have not.
Professor Zeitlin may have his doubts about a positive black identity. I myself do not, it is more than a mere matter of black or white appearances, but of pride in one's heritage. In my case, I am proud of my black Nigerian father, and my white Jewish mother. I draw upon the rich heritage that entails and I am in no doubt that I am black, whatever the shade of my skin.
If the meaning attached to having a black skin in Britain were not negative, I would have little doubt that the simplistic analysis of Professor Zeitlin would hold good. But in the real world, a black child does need positive images and reinforcement of his or her blackness.
Professor Zeitlin and your leading article ('A chance to get adoption right', 12 July) are correct to draw attention to attempts to reduce matching a child to adoptive parents on the question of race alone. This should never be the only consideration; but, for a black child, one of a number of important issues to be considered. The others must include language, culture, religion, diet, siblings, etc. That some social workers fail to do so (or appear to) is not an inherent fault of 'political correctness', but perhaps of the British tendency to reduce everything to obvious pigeon-holes. What may be first seen of a black child is their skin colour and not anything else about them. If social workers are guilty of this, so too is the majority of society.
Yours faithfully,
LINDA BELLOS
London, N4
13 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments