Letter: Local stations merged by BBC
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Nigel Chapman's reply to Polly Toynbee's plea for more local radio is opposite to the BBC's actual policy, which is to regionalise stations, rather than localise them.
Here on the south coast we once had an excellent local station called BBC Radio Brighton, providing a service of local news and information plus contributions from local musicians and personalities. This was eventually changed to BBC Radio Sussex, making it somewhat less local. Then it became BBC Radio Sussex & Surrey and now it is BBC Southern Counties Radio, covering parts of Hampshire, too.
Most of the original Brighton studios have been vacated, leaving a skeleton newsroom staff and no access for the public. What was once a local Brighton station is now run from Guildford and the all-talk output has little to interest listeners in Sussex. Letters of complaint to the BBC bring a standard answer that this is what the public wants.
IAN BUXTON
Brighton, East Sussex
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments