Letter: Lives on film
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It is possible to agree with Kevin Maher's scathing criticism of the biopic (Eye, 30 January) by closing one eye and excluding such dire Oscar-winning flops as Lawrence of Arabia and Gandhi, forgetting that commercial disaster The Sound of Music, passing over an enormous range of films from Bonnie and Clyde and Raging Bull to Schindler's List.
Of course, biopic is a difficult genre and there are failures, but this shouldn't discourage writers and directors from aiming for success, which is why we at the London Screenwriters Workshop have set up seminars on writing fiction based on fact.
After all, two versions of Henry V should remind us that at least one adventurous writer was rather partial to biography - and it did no harm to his financial and artistic career.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments