Letter: Little 'own' about 'own-brand'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.YOU ARE unfair to the owners of established brand names ('The real thing put to the test', Business, 24 April). They are not seeking to prevent supermarkets from providing customers with 'own-brand' products. The problem is that there is little 'own' about them. They are, in packaging and presentation, pastiches which seek to filch the goodwill and reputation built up over time by the brand names.
It is also nonsense to suggest that no direct financial loss is suffered by brand manufacturers. Every time a consumer buys Sainsbury's Classic Cola instead of Coca-Cola, Coca- Cola loses profit. If the 'copycats' did not benefit, why would they go to the trouble of imitating the established brands?
You make no mention of 'extended passing-off', an effective common law remedy that can prevent any trading which involves a misrepresentation causing damage to another trader's goodwill in a brand name. In the present case, the damage is clear, to judge from the brand owners' complaints. All it needs to prove is that the presentation of the 'copy-cat' packaging misrepresents the 'own-brand' product in some way. Champagne (in which we are involved) and Jif lemons have succeeded in this way.
David Sills
Christopher Hughes
Monier-Williams & Boxalls
solicitors
London WC2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments