LETTER:Little danger from the lobbies
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Peter Churchill
Sir: We would indeed need to be concerned that MPs are being encouraged to disguise their views to get on standing committees were they the powerful bodies that "amend proposed legislation" claimed in your front page-article "Secrets of the MPs who help lobbyists" (3 October). This is not the case, however.
A rather topical example is the bill to privatise the electric utilities that was debated in the 1980s. It received 110 hours of consideration by the respective standing committee, yet no amendments moved by the Government were rejected, and only one minor amendment moved by a backbench MP was agreed to, the MP in question being Conservative; none of the 227 amendments moved by the Opposition were accepted. (A. Adonis, Parliament Today 1990, MUP).
Yours faithfully,
P. Churchill
Spalding, Lincolnshire
3 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments