LETTER : Listed buildings can save you tax
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Vane Sutton-Vane
Sir: I am sure that many of us can equal or cap Peter Lord's example of the horrors of trying to alter a listed building (Letters, 16 March). At least he has got a window, whereas we have to live in gloom.
However, a point that seems to have been missed is that the listing of buildings is really back-door nationalisation, with no right of appeal and with no compensation. Surely, there should be a right of appeal and, as there is no such right in this country, should not the matter be taken to the European Courts?
For compensation, I suggest a 25 per cent reduction in council tax for all properties within a conservation area and a 50 per cent reduction for all listed buildings. This would concentrate the minds of some of the dottier local authorities and give owners some compensation for their loss of rights.
Yours sincerely,
VANE SUTTON-VANE
Sturminster Newton,
Dorset
16 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments