Letter : Licence fee is low-cost way to quality TV

David Elstein
Sunday 01 September 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Polly Toynbee (27 August) makes three errors in assuming that I advocate subscription funding replacing the licence fee simply in order to benefit Sky.

First, I have been arguing the subscription case for 14 years, long before I joined Sky. It is the most efficient, most honest and most flexible way of financing the BBC as a public service broadcaster, especially in the multi-channel age. Far from shedding "crocodile tears" over jailing licence evaders, I believe such actions to be unnecessary and deeply damaging to the BBC.

Second, it is not obvious why it is in Sky's interest for the BBC to act more commercially in pricing and selling its services. Indeed, a BBC freed from the constraints and odium of the licence fee might well provide the competitor to Sky for which your newspaper has so often called.

Third, Sky's chief executive has supported an immediate increase in the licence fee if the BBC was having trouble making ends meet on its pounds 2bn a year income.

The spread of digital television will eventually make a compulsory licence fee anomalous. The BBC should embrace that prospect and prepare now for the post-licence-fee future.

DAVID ELSTEIN

Head of Programming

British Sky Broadcasting

Isleworth, Middlesex

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in