Letter: Librarians who can recognise a teenage fiction winner
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The point I made in my Saturday review article, that a book about a serial killer murdering homeless teenagers in London was an unsuitable choice as winner of the Carnegie Medal for 'the outstanding children's book of the year', has not been addressed by either of the two correspondents whose letters have appeared in your columns (19 and 20 July).
The Library Association needs to take note of the quite distinct needs of teenagers and children, not quibble over 'an' and 'the'. And Alan Gibbons needs to ask himself whether his vision of the state of England is more realistic than mine. 'Poverty, racism and violence' do indeed haunt the country. They are not yet, thank God, anywhere near as common as prosperity, generosity and kindness. But children who have to watch our astonishingly gloomy television news and read books like this year's Carnegie winner could be forgiven for believing that they were. Many parents will testify to their deep depression, expressed in a tendency to turn away to fantasy in the form of cartoons and Gameboys.
Adults have a duty not just to explain the world's problems to children, but to offer them hope, and to put those problems in perspective. Too many 'issues' novels, Stone Cold among them, fail to do any such thing. Small wonder they sell in such tiny numbers (mainly to libraries), and children turn back to the boisterous empowering morality of Roald Dahl - and indeed to that perennial favourite, so derided by Mr Gibbons, Enid Blyton.
Yours faithfully,
CHRISTINA HARDYMENT
Oxford
20 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments