Letter: Lib Dems fear Labour embrace

Sir Cyril Smith
Thursday 05 December 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Lib Dems fear Labour embrace

Sir: In your report (23 November) of "unrest" about the idea of a Liberal Democrat coalition with Labour, you quoted one source as saying: "Mr Ashdown will tell the dissidents that the party endorsed his strategy ... at its party conference in 1995 ... We understand their concern but they are a small minority of people who are isolated."

I have little knowledge of Liberal Democrat feeling other than in the North-west region, of which I have the honour to be president, but in this region, opposition to a formal coalition with Labour is very strong indeed.

There is deep concern about joint working parties, but most of us are prepared to tolerate that provided it in no way compromises our independence as a party, even on those issues being discussed - but anything more than that, such as cabinet seats and propping up a Labour government, would be bitterly resented. It would be a gross betrayal of our party and its independence, and any Liberal Democrat MP or peer taking such a seat would be betraying his or her heritage.

Such a move would split our party, with scores and scores of our members, of whom I would be but one, failing to renew their membership. It would do irreparable damage.

That is why so many of my friends believe we should renounce that step now. If we do not, it will cost us parliamentary seats in the 1997 election as similar suggestions did in 1992.

I will always refuse to name names, but I know of at least four of our MPs opposed to a formal coalition, I know of at least five of our peers, and many of our prospective parliamentary candidates.

The only possible excuse would be a guarantee of proportional representation (not the alternative vote) in the first 12-month session - and that's like our chance of winning the Lottery.

Talking is acceptable. Coalition is suicide, merely to satisfy three or four egos, and we are most definitely not a "small minority".

Sir CYRIL SMITH

Rochdale,

Greater Manchester

The writer was Liberal Democrat MP for Rochdale until 1992

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in