Letter: Lib Dems' drugs debate: a question of responsibility

Mr George Ruston
Wednesday 21 September 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: We continually hear that cannabis is a 'sensational' drug - a term that puts its use on a par with sporting activity and places those who see it otherwise in the position of appearing negative. In fact, the 'recreational' use of cannabis brings memory loss and a lack of motivation. 'Skunk' is a type of cannabis that is so strong that it could be considered a 'hard' drug. The effects of cannabis will appear intermittently up to a week after use, as it is stored in body fat.

Why do people want to decriminalise cannabis? Is it just because a significant number of people use it? If this is their major argument, then perhaps we ought to legalise 'joy-riding' and other 'recreational' activities that offer enjoyment at the price of human pain.

The only good things that may come out of the decriminalisation debate are a realisation that the social use of legal or illegal drugs is a complex subject and that it is about time our society started to look at practical ways of pulling out of the drug culture altogether, rather than embracing it even more fully.

My organisation does believe in freedom of choices but we are also convinced that society should continue to adopt a framework which protects the weak and vulnerable, as well as offering a clear lead on positive community life.

Yours faithfully,

GEORGE RUSTON

Executive Director

UK Band of Hope

London, SE1

20 September

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in