Letter: Let the Tibetan people choose their own path to liberation

Peter Morrel
Saturday 18 October 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I enjoyed the article about Tibet but the author shows a remarkable lack of understanding of Buddhist principles.

Non-violence, compassion and loving the enemy are central to the Buddhist way of life - especially in Tibetan Buddhism. How could he, with the eyes of the world upon him, honestly advocate any form of violent path against China? And even if he did, what good would it serve?

Every time any publicity about Tibet has been generated the net result has always been more torture, more beatings, more disappearances.

The Tibetan people understand his message and it is not true that his stand is designed to appeal to his many Western admirers.

The dilemma facing the Dalai Lama revolves in part about the problem within Buddhism in general and of "being in the world but not of it". A problem the previous Dalai Lama spoke about often and which probably led in part to the invasion by China - ie neglect to implement political reforms. This problem also stems from having a religious leader running a country.

I think the comparisons with Gandhi are also flawed, mainly because Gandhi was not in the same sense a religious figure.

Peter Morrell

pmorr1sc@stokecoll.ac.uk

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in