Letter: Let the secrets out
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: You report the remarks of Lords Callaghan and Healey that the 30-year-rule on the disclosure of public records is an absurdity ("Cold War veterans come clean", 23 January). What makes the 30-year rule even more pernicious is that the Public Records Act contains all sorts of exemptions that mean many files are withheld well beyond the 30-year norm, often purely on the say-so of the relevant Departmental Records Officer.
A visit to the Public Records Office will show that vast tracts of the historical archive will remain closed to the public well into the next century, including even records relating to the Second World War.
The intelligent approach adopted by the Foreign Office on files relating to the Cold War should now be emulated by other departments, and the whole approach to the secrecy of public records reviewed under a Freedom of Information Act.
DAN CLIFTON
London SE5
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments