Letter: Let's not shake on it

Mr R. L. Barlow
Thursday 24 June 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Beatrix Campbell (Comment, 22 June) asks whether Westminster would have shown the same disrespect to any other head of state as, so she alleges, was shown to Mary Robinson in connection with her handshake with Gerry Adams. I would argue that disrespect is the wrong word, but it is obvious that the UK government would show the same attitude to any other head of state conducting himself in this way.

The other heads of state who would be prepared to put themselves in this position form a group in whose company Mrs Robinson would no doubt normally be reluctant to find herself. The fact that the handshake took place behind closed doors surely demonstrates that all concerned (except Sinn Fein, no doubt) felt uneasy about it.

Logically, the handshake was of no importance, but many of the people of this country believe that, at least by failing to act decisively against it, the Irish government tacitly supports the IRA. If it is ever going to persuade those people that they are wrong, such incidents as this cannot be repeated. I suspect this was the source of the unease to which I refer.

Yours faithfully,

R. L. BARLOW

Leeds

23 June

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in