Letter: Let justice be the sole yardstick for punishment

Mr M. C. Felderhof
Tuesday 19 October 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Surely your headline 'Prison in our society: does it really work?' (16 October) is highly misleading. It reinforces a mistaken belief that the primary reason for a prison sentence is to reform the criminal or deter others. Instead, the function of the legal system is to uphold justice. This is a moral task. In this context the only questions worth asking are: is the person guilty? If so, is a prison sentence the appropriate sentence or punishment to expiate the guilt?

To suggest that one might 'punish' one person to deter others without the punishment being first and foremost deserved in its own right, is simply immoral. Furthermore, to 'punish' a person simply to change his behaviour smacks of a manipulative and behaviourist approach, which is less than moral.

One must not submit justice to the calculative mentality which asks whether prison is cost-effective. Only when justice has been upheld and an appropriate punishment meted out can one raise the subsidiary questions of what else we must do to enhance the well-being of the prisoner and of society.

By focusing on justice, one may of course conclude in many cases that imprisonment is not the best nor the only appropriate form of punishment.

Yours sincerely,

M. C. FELDERHOF

Bournville,

Birmingham

17 October

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in