Letter: Lessons Mitchell brought to the Spitfire design
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Lessons Mitchell brought to the Spitfire designSir: Alan Clark's reference to General Galland was perhaps ill-advised. In his book The First and the Last Galland describes his encounter with Goring: " 'I should like an outfit of Spitfires for my group!' After blurting this out, I had rather a shock, for it was not really meant that way. Of course, fundamentally I preferred the Me109 to the Spitfire, but I was unbelievably vexed at the lack of understanding and the stubbornness with which the Command gave us orders we could not execute."
This account must be seen in the context of his earlier comparison: "The modern Vickers Supermarine Spitfires were slower than our planes by about 10 to 15 mph, but could perform steeper and tighter turns ... Our armament and ammunition were also undoubtedly better." (Galland's assessment refers to the versions available in 1940.)
John Allenby
Farnham, Surrey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments