Letter: Less to lose with mediation

Rita Bleiman
Saturday 18 December 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I READ with interest Sue Fieldman's article 'Splitting up is harder to do' (Business, 12 December). Some valid and constructive points were made but I must, however, take issue with Margaret Bennett and Peter Grose-Hodge, both matrimonial solicitors.

The aim in mediation is to try as far as possible to correct an imbalance in bargaining power. Full financial disclosure is required. How much better it is for a couple to discuss their finances together rather than at arm's length. There are, of course, situations where the couple cannot cope with a face- to-face encounter.

My experience in more than five years as a family mediator with the Family Mediators Association shows that if the mediators ensure that the couple have full information, they are able to make decisions for themselves which they feel are fair and equitable for their given situation. In most cases, this is far cheaper, emotionally and financially, than the adversarial route.

For Miss Bennett to call the Lord Chancellor's proposals 'off-the-wall' and 'ridiculous' before there has even been any debate on the issues surprises me.

Mr Grose-Hodge makes the perfectly valid point that in order for mediation to succeed the mediators have to be skilled and professional. Nevertheless, his views relating to 'do-gooding social workers, ex-probation officers and the blue-rinse princess brigade with a little time on their hands' are insulting and bear no resemblance to my colleagues.

Rita Bleiman

Family Mediators Association

London N10

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in