LETTER:Legal aid for medical litigation

Mr Eric Morris
Wednesday 07 February 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Eric Morris

Sir: In answer to Dr Anthony Barton's criticisms of how medical negligence litigation proceeds (letter, 30 January), the Legal Aid Board is, in my experience, extremely stringent in its evidential requirements to allow a medical negligence action to proceed, initially issuing a Legal Aid Certificate limited to allowing preliminary investigation by a suitably qualified medical expert.

It is only after such an expert has confirmed that a reasonable case exists that matters are progressed further and proceedings issued. Even then, there is normally a requirement for regular reports to be made concerning the progress and viability of the proceedings.

No medical negligence action proceeds without significant support from members of the medical profession who are invariably of consultant status. To suggest the lawyers are somehow writing themselves open cheques and allowing unmeritorious actions to continue is grossly misleading and diverts attention from how standards of medical practice and procedure are to be increased.

Yours faithfully,

Eric Morris

Osborne, Morris & Morgan

Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in