Letter: Left cold by waste

Mr Roger James
Sunday 15 May 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I shared Philip Williams's enthusiasm (Letter, 13 May) for the Deptford incinerator until I visited it and studied its specification. My disillusion began with the discovery that this is not a Combined Heat and Power (CHP) plant. It uses air-cooled condensers, thus throwing away any possibility of recovering the waste heat.

What it can do, much less efficiently, is to divert some of the steam from electricity generation to provide district heating. At the very best this might give 60 per cent efficiency, as compared with 85 per cent theoretically possible from CHP.

Taking the calorific value of municipal solid waste to be one third that of coal, the efficiency of the electricity generation at Deptford works out at 25 per cent compared with the 35 per cent obtained from the best coal- and oil- burning power stations. Such stations obviously have to pay for their fuel.

My second shock was finding that the local authorities of south- east London, having incurred all the expenses of collecting the 'fuel', then have to pay the operators pounds 20 a ton to accept it. Whether or not a case can be made for plants like Deptford on environmental grounds, there is clearly no economic case.

Yours faithfully,

ROBERT JAMES

Southsea, Hampshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in