Letter: Laying down the law on data protection
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr David Anson
Sir: I must take exception to comments raised by Liz Parratt in her letter today (27 May) suggesting that the police are exempt from the Data Protection Principle One requiring that users obtain and process data fairly and lawfully. The police have to abide by every one of the data protection principles and have to be able to show to the Data Protection Registrar that this is being done. Much training is given to police officers to ensure that this is the case and there are numerous checks to ensure that Principle One is rigidly applied.
What Ms Parratt is probably objecting to is that the police have an exemption from disclosing to a Data Subject (a living individual) information which is kept on certain specified systems. The only systems that are covered by this exemption are in relation to computerised intelligence records. I would hope that any reasonable law-abiding person would understand this exemption just as every criminal would wish it was not there.
The Registrar has the power to carry out checks on this and the power to remove the exemption if he is not happy that the system is being operated within the Principles of Data Protection, as well as levying an unlimited fine.
Yours faithfully,
DAVID ANSON
Preston,
Lancashire
27 May
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments