Letter: Lawbreaking by police to be legalised
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Lawbreaking by police to be legalised
Sir: Patricia Wynn Davies commented on the bugging provisions of the Police Bill and reported that Liberty had obtained a legal opinion that those provisions violated the right to privacy contained in the European Convention on Human Rights ("State licence to bug and burgle", 3 December).
Jack Straw has argued that the police have been acting for many years as if they already had these powers. This illegality by the police has recently been exposed by two cases that Liberty has been involved with, one of which is pending with the European Commission of Human Rights.
Parliamentary acceptance of the use of listening devices in absence of any real controls will make the situation worse.However much we may admire chief officers of police for their integrity and independence, trusting the police to police themselves is not an adequate safeguard. The placing of listening devices by the police in the past did break the law: that is why they need this legislation. Who was it that authorised police officers to do this under the bad old scheme? Why, chief officers of police of course!
It has been argued that the new provisions allow for supervision by a judge. However, complaints will be rare because we will never be told we are being listened to. My client whose case is pending in Strasbourg only found out he was under surveillance when he moved his furniture to find the police had drilled a hole through the wall to insert the bug.
The Police Bill is of great constitutional significance. The Government and the Labour Party have failed to recognise this, presumably because they believe that being tough on crime requires them also to be tough on constitutional and human rights. Those innocent of any crime will be subject to its powers either because without independent controls the police will get sloppy or because the police, who have a history of gathering "intelligence" on those who have different lifestyles, political opinions or skin colours from the majority, need only ask their own boss for permission.
JOHN WADHAM
Director
Liberty
London SE1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments