LETTER:Law should distinguish between `mob' and peaceful protesters
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Chris Payne
Sir: As representative of the company currently exporting thousands of veal calves through Coventry Airport, J. E. Bradshaw (letter, 15 April) can hardly be expected to be a disinterested commentator on the recent court rulings. In reducing the issues to those of public order and the demonisation of the protesters, he cleverly throws a smokescreen over the original reasons for the protests and the fact that many people regard his company's activities as representing the darker, unacceptable face of capitalism. Lawful as the law stands, but morally right? - definitely not.
No doubt Mr Bradshaw would like me, as a member of the public, to bottle up my "offended sensitivities" and turn a blind eye to the cruelties his trade perpetrates. I would go so far as to suggest that he would be more than content with a protest movement that is "out of control, leaderless and without a coherent strategy", because this would deflect public attention from the real issues.
What he must fear most continues to develop: a broad-based movement that does its work on many different levels and in many ways - raising awareness, informing, educating, lobbying to change the laws, demonstrating, and, yes, for some "direct action'' - which puts effective change as its main objective. Unfortunately for him, there is no decision to "abandon the constitutional route". Mr Bradshaw can be assured that there is a coherent movement "out there", which will not be deterred by his attempts to evade the real issues, which relate to his indefensible trade.
Yours sincerely,
CHRIS FAYNE
Kenilworth, Warwickshire
15 April
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments