Letter: Law denies me a natural medicine

Amanda Sperritt
Wednesday 09 July 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Last week I was sentenced to three months' imprisonment, suspended for two years on medical grounds, for growing cannabis. I had used it as an analgesic in order to reduce my intake of less effective, more harmful, prescription drugs. I have a rare genetic condition, Ehlers Danlos syndrome, which causes pain in many of my joints due to muscle spasm, nerve pain and arthritic inflammation.

You report ("Doctors back cannabis products", 3 July) the call by the British Medical Association for the licensing of a wider range of drugs derived from cannabis for medicinal use. It is encouraging that the BMA recognises the potential of cannabis, but I am concerned that they are looking at licensing further synthetic preparations rather than reassessing the natural herb.

Why attempt to isolate and synthesise therapeutically active chemicals from the plant, whose actions may be down to a complex interaction of its many chemical ingredients? This is not what patients are asking for; we merely want the right to smoke a naturally growing substance without being criminalised, humiliated and punished by the law.

The side-effects of cannabis mentioned by Edward Tierney GP - distorting perception, reducing vigilance and causing apathy and indifference - are just some of the side-effects also caused by pharmaceutical alternatives. The various pills I have tried have had all these and more, including nausea, loss of appetite, addiction, digestive disorders and other adverse effects. The effects mentioned by Dr Tierney may be fairly common as a short-term reaction in the novice recreational user, but a tolerance tends to develop with regular use.

Cannabis does not necessarily have to be smoked; it can also be ingested in drinks, sweets, biscuits etc, which may be better for health. Research into this area would be much more useful to patients than the development of more synthetic drugs for us to risk taking.

AMANDA SPERRITT

Calne, Wiltshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in