Letter: Land rights
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.YOUR piece on the right to roam, "Forget the grouse. Let's go for a stroll" (Travel, 15 March), promotes the view that we have an inherent right to go wherever we choose, and that this is being usurped by rich, selfish landowners for no good reason.
The situation is a lot more complex. Ironically the well-being of the moors, grouse and other wildlife can be assured only because owners actively manage them for the income that the shooting brings in - otherwise the heather and grouse would be replaced by grass and sheep. Two or three visitors will cause no harm but thousands of walkers and their dogs will scare birds, trample plants and erode hillsides. Perhaps the right- to-roam lobby should ask whether it is they who are being too selfish and whether conservation and the environment are not better served by the status quo.
CG Palmer
Baslow, Derbyshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments