Letter: Laing was wrong about madness
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Andreas Whittam Smith ("The man who abolished madness", 13 May) suggests that the outcome of R D Laing's approach to treating schizophrenia was "as good or better" than a more medical approach and that "no malfunctioning of the brain has yet been detected that explains mental illness". He is misinformed on both counts.
It was the introduction of chlorpromazine in the 1950s which did more to "abolish madness" than de-medicalising schizophrenia. Scans of the working brain now consistently show the physical basis of hallucinations in people who suffer from schizophrenia.
In his book Sanity, Madness and the Family Laing suggested that a woman's psychotic symptoms were "the outcome of her ... interaction with her parents", falsely condemning a generation of parents to the belief that they were responsible for their children's schizophrenia. Community care has many problems, but let us not go back 40 years in the hope that a charismatic but misguided psychotherapist had the solutions.
Dr PETER WHITE
Consultant psychiatrist
St Bartholomew's Hospital
London EC1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments