Letter: Labour's tax plans: gainers and double standards
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: How can Stephen Dorrell refuse to accept that a 1 per cent increase in National Insurance contributions is not more regressive than a similar rise in the rate of income tax ('Dorrell says tax rise will be average of pounds 5.75 a week', 6 April)?
NI contributions are paid by people below the tax threshold, and, at the same time, do not apply to earnings in excess of pounds 420 a week. So anyone earning more than pounds 20,000 a year will find their extra deductions taking a smaller share of their income than someone below that level - a perfect illustration of a regressive effect.
Yours etc,
HARVEY R. COLE
Winchester
6 April
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments