Letter: Labour's new education policy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Peter Kilfoyle (letter, 25 June) defends Diversity and Excellence with such obvious conviction that he may feel enough confidence in Labour's new education policy to answer some questions about its contents.
1. If foundation and community schools are to enjoy virtually identical status and funding, what is the purpose of creating two sectors within the secondary system?
2. If selection in general is to be discouraged or prohibited, why does the new policy only rule out a "return to selection through the 11+" - a notion that no one of consequence supports.
The objection to Diversity and Excellence is the opportunity it provides for social selection - the ability of articulate and self-confident parents to talk their children's way into "the best" schools. This will not be overcome by promising "locally agreed" admissions procedures. Nor will it be overcome through academic selection by methods other than the 11+. Some localities will joyfully endorse the creation of a hierarchy of schools. Therefore,
3. Will the selection criteria "laid down by the Department for Education" specifically exclude all forms of social and academic selection?
The paragraphs in Diversity and Excellence that deal with funding promise a "fair and open" allocation of resources. No one will disagree with that. But some heads will interpret it as a provision of extra resources for schools with large sixth forms and exemplary examination results. Others will believe (as I do) that special provision must be made for schools in areas of deprivation.
4. Since it seems unlikely that "fair and open" funding means equal per capita grants for all secondary schools, what is the formula to be?
Yours sincerely,
Roy Hattersley
MP for Birmingham
Sparkbrook (Lab)
House of Commons
London, SW1
26 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments