Letter: Labour's new education policy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In his article "Labour's big bad idea" (22 June), my friend and colleague Roy Hattersley has gone way over the top when he claims that Labour, in its new policy statement, Diversity and Excellence, has abandoned the comprehensive principle. As a fellow former shadow education spokesman, and a parent, I support the comprehensive principle just as strongly as he does.
But in two key respects, the world has changed since the Seventies. First, whether we like it or not, there are now more than a thousand grant maintained schools. Secondly, with the introduction of local management, 85 per cent of the schools' aggregated budget is delegated to the individual school, thus giving significant autonomy. So the problem for the Labour Party is how to ensure fair, non-selective and accountable schooling without causing major disruption.
By insisting on equitable funding between schools and on non-selective entry, Diversity and Excellence removes the two major arguments against grant maintained schools. It also makes it far less likely that parents at existing schools will vote for grant maintained status. At the same time, these schools will be made accountable to the local community because they will have to agree their admissions systems with LEAs.
In my view, Labour's proposals provide a sensible and fair organisational framework within which schools will be able to get on with providing high standards for all pupils. It is significant that local educational authorities are to be given a new role in promoting standards. Good educational attainment is the vital educational issue - and I would prefer to see Roy Hattersley putting his great authority and experience into campaigning for his party on quality education for all.
Yours etc,
Giles Radice
MP for Durham North (Lab)
House of Commons
London, SW1
26 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments